ARCON vs Fortra: Comprehensive Analysis of Privileged Access and Vulnerability Management Solutions

In today’s rapidly evolving cybersecurity landscape, organizations face increasingly sophisticated threats that require robust security solutions. Two major players in this arena are ARCON and Fortra, offering specialized tools for privileged access management (PAM) and vulnerability management. As cyber threats become more complex and regulations more stringent, selecting the right security partner becomes a critical decision for security professionals. This in-depth analysis examines both vendors’ capabilities, strengths, limitations, and overall suitability for different organizational needs in the security ecosystem.

The Current State of Cybersecurity and Privileged Access Management

The cybersecurity landscape has undergone dramatic transformation in recent years. With the rise of cloud infrastructure, remote work, and increasingly sophisticated attack vectors, traditional security perimeters have dissolved. According to recent industry reports, privileged credential abuse continues to be implicated in approximately 80% of data breaches. This alarming statistic underscores the critical importance of robust privileged access management (PAM) solutions in modern security architectures.

Both ARCON and Fortra have positioned themselves as leaders in addressing these challenges, albeit with different approaches and specializations. ARCON has built its reputation primarily around its comprehensive Privileged Access Management solutions, while Fortra (formerly HelpSystems) has developed a broader portfolio of security and automation products through strategic acquisitions, including robust vulnerability management capabilities.

Market analysts consistently rank PAM among the top security priorities for CISOs and security teams, with Gartner predicting continued double-digit growth in this sector through 2025. Both vendors recognize this opportunity and continue to evolve their offerings to address emerging threats and compliance requirements across industries and geographies.

ARCON: Enterprise Security Through Privileged Access Control

Core Capabilities and Solution Portfolio

ARCON has established itself as a specialized provider in the privileged access management space with its flagship product, ARCON | Privileged Access Management (PAM). The solution provides comprehensive protection against insider threats and privileged account misuse through a robust set of features:

• Privileged Account Discovery: Automated discovery and inventory of privileged accounts across diverse IT environments
• Password Vaulting: Secure storage with automated rotation of privileged credentials
• Just-in-Time Privileged Access: Temporary, context-aware privileged access provisioning
• Session Monitoring and Recording: Real-time oversight and forensic records of privileged sessions
• User Behavior Analytics: AI-driven analysis to detect anomalous privileged user behavior

Beyond its core PAM solution, ARCON has expanded its portfolio to include ARCON | Endpoint Privilege Management (EPM) for controlling local admin rights on endpoints, and ARCON | Secure Compliance Management (SCM) for streamlining and automating compliance processes. This integrated approach enables organizations to implement comprehensive privileged access governance frameworks that address both security and compliance requirements.

ARCON’s architecture is designed to support both on-premises and cloud deployments, with specific capabilities for managing privileged access across hybrid environments. The platform’s ability to integrate with various enterprise systems—including directory services, SIEM solutions, and ticketing systems—enhances its utility within complex IT ecosystems.

Technical Architecture and Deployment Options

ARCON’s technical architecture is built around a secure vault that serves as the central repository for privileged credentials. The system comprises several key components:

• Server Manager: The core component that manages policies, workflows, and integration with enterprise systems
• Vault: Secure storage for encrypted credentials with HSM integration options
• Session Manager: Component responsible for establishing, monitoring, and recording privileged sessions
• Client Gateway: Interface for end-users to request and access privileged resources

Deployment flexibility is a notable strength, with options including:

• Traditional on-premises deployment
• Private cloud implementation
• Hybrid configurations
• Managed PAM services through partners

The architecture supports high availability configurations with active-passive or active-active setups, addressing enterprise requirements for resilience and fault tolerance. For organizations with strict data sovereignty requirements, ARCON’s ability to maintain all credential data within specific geographic boundaries represents a significant compliance advantage.

A sample configuration for ARCON PAM might look like this:

# Example ARCON PAM Server Configuration
server {
    listen 443 ssl;
    server_name pam.example.com;
    
    ssl_certificate /etc/ssl/certs/pam.crt;
    ssl_certificate_key /etc/ssl/private/pam.key;
    
    location / {
        proxy_pass https://arcon-pam-server;
        proxy_set_header Host $host;
        proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
    }
    
    # Configuration for ARCON Session Manager
    location /sm/ {
        proxy_pass https://arcon-session-manager;
        proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade;
        proxy_set_header Connection "upgrade";
    }
}

User Experience and Interface Design

ARCON’s user interface reflects its focus on security-first design principles. The administrative console provides detailed configuration options and comprehensive reporting capabilities, while the end-user portal emphasizes simplicity and efficiency for privileged access requests and session initiation.

The dashboard provides security administrators with real-time visibility into privileged account usage, policy violations, and potential risk indicators. Recent updates have introduced more customizable reporting options and enhanced visualization capabilities, helping security teams translate complex privileged access data into actionable intelligence.

A notable strength in ARCON’s approach is the balance between security controls and usability. The system incorporates features like:

• Single sign-on integration for streamlined authentication
• Customizable approval workflows that reflect organizational hierarchy
• Browser-based access to target systems without requiring endpoint software installation
• Mobile application support for approvals and emergency access

User feedback consistently highlights ARCON’s responsive technical support and structured implementation methodology as differentiating factors in the deployment experience, with reviews on Gartner Peer Insights averaging 4.7 stars from 510 verified reviews.

Fortra: Comprehensive Security Through Integration

Platform Evolution and Strategic Direction

Fortra, previously known as HelpSystems, has pursued a deliberate acquisition strategy to build a comprehensive cybersecurity and automation portfolio. This approach has resulted in an expansive product lineup that addresses multiple security domains, including vulnerability management, secure file transfer, data protection, and privileged access management through its acquisition of Digital Defense, Cobalt Strike, and other specialized vendors.

The company’s rebranding from HelpSystems to Fortra in 2022 reflected this strategic evolution from IT operations tools to a security-focused enterprise. This transformation has positioned Fortra as a provider of integrated security solutions rather than point products, appealing to organizations seeking to consolidate their security vendor relationships.

Fortra’s strategic direction emphasizes cross-product integration and unified management, with recent development efforts focused on creating a cohesive security ecosystem. This approach differs significantly from ARCON’s specialized focus, representing two contrasting philosophies in the security market: integrated platform versus best-of-breed specialization.

Vulnerability Management Capabilities

Fortra’s Vulnerability Management (VM) solution provides organizations with tools to identify, prioritize, and remediate security vulnerabilities across their infrastructure. Key capabilities include:

• Continuous Scanning: Automated discovery and assessment of vulnerabilities with minimal performance impact
• Risk-Based Prioritization: Contextual scoring that considers both vulnerability severity and business impact
• Remediation Guidance: Actionable recommendations for addressing identified vulnerabilities
• Compliance Mapping: Correlation between vulnerabilities and specific compliance requirements
• Integration with DevSecOps: APIs and plugins for incorporating vulnerability assessment into CI/CD pipelines

The solution architecture combines agent-based assessment for comprehensive endpoint coverage with agentless scanning for network infrastructure. This hybrid approach provides flexibility in deployment while ensuring thorough coverage across diverse IT environments.

Implementation example for Fortra VM scanning configuration:

# Fortra VM Configuration Example - Scan Profile
<ScanProfile name="Critical Infrastructure Scan">
  <ScanFrequency>86400</ScanFrequency> 
  <TargetGroups>
    <Group id="production-servers" />
    <Group id="payment-processing" />
  </TargetGroups>
  <ScanOptions>
    <Option name="port-scan-range">1-1024,3389,5900,8080,8443</Option>
    <Option name="scan-intensity">thorough</Option>
    <Option name="credentials">use</Option>
    <Option name="scan-outside-maintenance-window">false</Option>
  </ScanOptions>
  <Notifications>
    <OnCompletion recipients="security-team@example.com" />
    <OnCriticalFindings recipients="security-team@example.com,it-managers@example.com" />
  </Notifications>
</ScanProfile>

Fortra VM distinguishes itself through enhanced contextualization capabilities. The system correlates vulnerability data with threat intelligence, asset criticality, and existing security controls to provide truly risk-based prioritization. This approach helps security teams focus remediation efforts on vulnerabilities that represent the most significant business risk, rather than simply addressing those with the highest CVSS scores.

Integrated Security Approach

Beyond vulnerability management, Fortra offers a comprehensive security portfolio that includes:

• Data Protection: Solutions for data classification, data loss prevention, and secure file transfer
• Infrastructure Protection: Tools for securing servers, endpoints, and network infrastructure
• Security Automation: Workflow automation for security operations and incident response
• Penetration Testing: Solutions for security testing and validation

The strategic advantage of Fortra’s approach lies in the potential for cross-product integration. For example, vulnerability data from Fortra VM can inform access control decisions in privileged access management, while data classification information can enhance data protection policies. This integrated approach aims to reduce the integration burden typically associated with multi-vendor security stacks.

A distinguishing characteristic of Fortra’s offering is its emphasis on managed service provider (MSP) partnerships. The company has developed specific licensing models and management capabilities designed for service providers, enabling them to deliver Fortra’s solutions as managed services. This approach broadens Fortra’s market reach and provides flexible consumption options for end-customers.

One notable customer testimonial highlights this integration value: “We’ve reduced our security vendor count from twelve to four by consolidating on Fortra’s platform. The operational efficiency gains were immediate, and the cross-product visibility has significantly improved our security posture.”

Head-to-Head Comparison: Key Differentiators

Privileged Access Management Capabilities

In the privileged access management domain, ARCON demonstrates clear superiority with its purpose-built solution. The company’s exclusive focus on privileged access has resulted in deeper functionality across core PAM capabilities, particularly in areas like just-in-time privileged access provisioning and privileged session monitoring. ARCON’s solution also provides more granular control over command execution during privileged sessions, enabling organizations to implement strict least-privilege policies.

While Fortra offers PAM capabilities as part of its broader portfolio, these features are less mature than ARCON’s specialized offering. Organizations primarily seeking robust privileged access management would likely find ARCON’s solution more comprehensive and capable of addressing advanced use cases such as managing privileged access to containerized environments, cloud infrastructure, and DevOps tools.

Vulnerability Management Comparison

In vulnerability management, the roles are reversed. Fortra’s dedicated VM solution demonstrates significant advantages in scanning capabilities, coverage breadth, and remediation workflow automation. The solution’s risk-based prioritization, which incorporates business context and threat intelligence, provides more actionable vulnerability management than standard severity-based approaches.

ARCON’s vulnerability assessment capabilities are limited to those included in its Secure Compliance Management module, focusing primarily on compliance-related configuration checks rather than comprehensive vulnerability detection. Organizations requiring robust vulnerability management would find Fortra’s solution substantially more capable in identifying, prioritizing, and remediating security vulnerabilities across their infrastructure.

Implementation and Integration

Implementation complexity and integration capabilities represent key differentiators between these vendors. ARCON’s focused solution typically enables faster implementation of PAM capabilities, with most organizations achieving operational status within 4-8 weeks. The company’s implementation methodology is well-defined, with clear phases for discovery, configuration, testing, and production deployment.

Fortra’s broader portfolio may require longer implementation timeframes, particularly when deploying multiple integrated products. However, this initial investment can yield long-term benefits through reduced integration complexity between security functions. Organizations already using multiple Fortra products may find significant value in the cross-product workflows and unified management capabilities.

Both vendors provide professional services to support implementation, though Fortra’s service offerings extend across a broader range of security domains. ARCON’s services are more specialized around privileged access management and compliance, often resulting in deeper expertise in these specific areas.

Support, Services, and User Satisfaction

Customer support represents a critical evaluation factor for security solutions, particularly those managing high-privilege access or critical vulnerability information. Based on verified user reviews and comparative analysis:

• ARCON maintains an impressive 4.7-star rating from 510 verified reviews on Gartner Peer Insights, with particularly strong scores for service and support quality
• Fortra shows limited public review data with only 3 verified reviews on Gartner, though all provide 5-star ratings
• ARCON customers consistently praise the vendor’s responsive support and willingness to develop custom solutions for unique requirements
• Fortra customers highlight the vendor’s comprehensive knowledge base and multi-channel support options as strengths

The significant difference in review volume makes direct comparison challenging, though both vendors maintain strong satisfaction scores from their respective customer bases. ARCON’s larger review sample provides greater statistical confidence in their consistently high ratings.

Service delivery models differ between the vendors, with ARCON focusing primarily on direct support and implementation services, while Fortra maintains both direct support and a robust partner ecosystem for service delivery. Organizations with multinational operations may benefit from Fortra’s broader global support presence, while those seeking highly specialized PAM expertise might prefer ARCON’s focused approach.

Pricing and Licensing Models

Licensing structures represent another area of significant differentiation:

• ARCON typically implements user-based licensing for its PAM solution, with pricing tiers based on the number of privileged users and additional modules required. This model provides predictable scaling as organizations grow their privileged user base.
• Fortra employs various licensing models across its portfolio, including user-based, asset-based, and capacity-based options. For vulnerability management specifically, pricing typically scales based on the number of IPs or assets scanned.

Both vendors offer subscription-based licensing with annual or multi-year terms, reflecting the industry-wide shift away from perpetual licensing. Fortra has developed specific MSP-friendly licensing options that enable service providers to offer their solutions on a consumption basis, potentially reducing initial investment requirements for smaller organizations.

Total cost of ownership considerations extend beyond initial licensing to include implementation services, ongoing maintenance, and operational overhead. ARCON’s focused solution may require less operational overhead in PAM-specific scenarios, while Fortra’s integrated approach could reduce total costs for organizations implementing multiple security functions from their portfolio.

Use Case Analysis: Matching Solutions to Organizational Needs

Enterprise Privileged Access Management

For large enterprises primarily focused on implementing robust privileged access controls, ARCON presents the more comprehensive solution. Its specialized PAM capabilities excel in complex environments with diverse privileged access requirements, particularly in highly regulated industries like finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure.

A major financial services organization implementing ARCON PAM reported: “The solution’s ability to implement just-in-time privileged access with multi-level approvals was essential for our compliance with financial regulations. The session monitoring capabilities provide the detailed audit trails our regulators demand.”

Key advantages for this use case include:

• More granular access controls for privileged operations
• Advanced session monitoring with command filtering
• Sophisticated privileged behavior analytics
• Comprehensive privileged access lifecycle management

Implementation in this scenario typically involves phased deployment, beginning with the highest-risk privileged accounts (typically infrastructure administrators and database administrators) and gradually expanding to include application-level privileges and developer access to production systems.

Comprehensive Vulnerability Management

Organizations prioritizing vulnerability management capabilities would find Fortra’s solution substantially more capable. Its comprehensive scanning, risk-based prioritization, and remediation workflow automation provide the essential components of an effective vulnerability management program.

A healthcare provider utilizing Fortra VM noted: “The solution’s ability to prioritize vulnerabilities based on actual exploit availability and our specific network context has transformed our remediation process. We’re addressing the truly critical issues first rather than chasing high CVSS scores that don’t represent real risk in our environment.”

Advantages in this scenario include:

• Broader coverage across diverse IT assets
• More sophisticated prioritization capabilities
• Better integration with remediation workflows
• Advanced reporting for security and compliance stakeholders

Typical implementation approaches include initial discovery scanning to establish a baseline, followed by regular scheduled scans with different frequencies for various asset criticality levels. Integration with the organization’s patch management and configuration management systems creates a closed-loop remediation process.

Integrated Security Operations

For organizations seeking to build integrated security operations with unified visibility across multiple security domains, Fortra’s comprehensive portfolio offers significant advantages. The ability to correlate data across vulnerability management, privileged access, data protection, and other security functions enables more comprehensive risk management and security operations.

A manufacturing company implementing multiple Fortra solutions commented: “The integration between vulnerability data, privileged access controls, and data protection has given us unprecedented visibility into our security posture. We can now see how vulnerabilities might impact our privileged access architecture and adjust controls accordingly.”

Benefits in this scenario include:

• Reduced integration complexity compared to multi-vendor approaches
• Consistent management interface across security functions
• Cross-product workflows and automation capabilities
• Simplified vendor management and support engagement

This approach typically involves a strategic implementation roadmap that prioritizes the most critical security functions first (often vulnerability management or privileged access) and gradually expands to include additional components of the Fortra portfolio as organizational maturity increases.

Future Roadmap and Strategic Considerations

Evaluating vendors’ strategic direction and innovation roadmap provides insight into the long-term viability of their solutions. Both ARCON and Fortra have articulated clear strategic visions, though with different emphases reflecting their market positioning.

ARCON’s Innovation Trajectory

ARCON’s development roadmap maintains its focused approach on privileged access management with expansion into adjacent areas. Key strategic initiatives include:

• Zero Trust Architecture: Enhanced integration of PAM within broader Zero Trust frameworks
• Cloud PAM: Expanded capabilities for managing privileged access across multi-cloud environments
• DevOps Security: Specialized capabilities for securing privileged access in CI/CD pipelines and container environments
• Advanced AI Analytics: Deeper application of machine learning for predictive privilege abuse detection

ARCON’s acquisition history has been limited, reflecting an organic growth strategy focused on extending core capabilities rather than expanding into new security domains. This approach maintains solution cohesiveness but may limit the breadth of security challenges ARCON can address independently.

Customer influence on the product roadmap appears strong, with multiple reviewers noting that their feature requests have been incorporated into subsequent releases. This responsiveness to customer requirements represents a significant advantage for organizations with unique PAM requirements.

Fortra’s Strategic Direction

Fortra’s strategy continues to emphasize portfolio expansion and integration, with significant investments in:

• Cross-product Integration: Deeper interoperability between different security components
• Security Automation: Enhanced workflow automation across security functions
• Unified Management: Consolidated visibility and control across the security portfolio
• Cloud-native Architecture: Modernization of acquired technologies for cloud delivery

The company’s active acquisition strategy introduces both opportunities and challenges. While acquisitions bring new capabilities and talent, integration of disparate technologies and cultures requires significant investment and can temporarily disrupt product development and support.

Fortra’s rebranding from HelpSystems reflects this strategic pivot to security-first positioning. This evolution continues to reshape the company’s identity in the market and influences its development priorities across the portfolio.

Market Position and Financial Stability

Both vendors demonstrate financial stability and market traction, though with different profiles:

• ARCON remains privately held with steady organic growth in the PAM market
• Fortra (formerly HelpSystems) operates with backing from private equity investors, enabling its aggressive acquisition strategy

Market recognition varies significantly, with ARCON maintaining a strong presence in specialized PAM evaluations while Fortra appears across multiple security market segments. Industry analyst coverage reflects these different positioning strategies, with ARCON frequently appearing in PAM-specific evaluations and Fortra recognized across diverse security domains.

Long-term stability considerations should include:

• Vendor’s historical commitment to product lines
• Investment in research and development
• Customer retention metrics
• Partnership ecosystem health

Both vendors demonstrate positive indicators across these dimensions, suggesting sustainable operations for the foreseeable future.

Making the Selection: Decision Framework for Security Leaders

Choosing between ARCON and Fortra requires careful alignment of organizational requirements with vendor capabilities. The following decision framework provides structured guidance for security leaders evaluating these solutions:

1. Primary Security Objective

Begin by identifying your organization’s primary security objective:

• If privileged access control represents your highest priority, ARCON’s specialized capabilities likely provide superior value
• If vulnerability management is your primary concern, Fortra offers more comprehensive capabilities
• If you seek integrated security across multiple domains, Fortra’s broad portfolio provides advantages

2. Operational Environment Characteristics

Evaluate your operational environment for key characteristics:

• Technology Diversity: Highly heterogeneous environments with diverse privileged access requirements may benefit from ARCON’s specialized PAM capabilities
• Compliance Requirements: Organizations under strict regulatory oversight often find ARCON’s detailed privileged session controls advantageous
• Scalability Needs: Large enterprise deployments with thousands of privileged users should carefully evaluate both vendors’ performance at scale

3. Implementation and Operational Considerations

Consider practical implementation and operational factors:

• Existing Security Investments: Current use of either vendor’s solutions may create a strategic advantage for expanding with the same provider
• Technical Resources: Assess your team’s capacity to implement and maintain specialized solutions versus integrated platforms
• Implementation Timeline: Urgent security requirements may favor focused solutions with faster deployment timeframes

4. Strategic Alignment

Align vendor selection with your organization’s broader security strategy:

• Best-of-Breed Approach: Organizations pursuing specialized solutions for each security domain may prefer ARCON’s focused excellence in PAM
• Consolidated Security: Security teams seeking to reduce vendor complexity may favor Fortra’s integrated portfolio
• Cloud Strategy: Evaluate each vendor’s capabilities for securing cloud environments and supporting your cloud migration trajectory

The ideal selection process includes proof-of-concept implementations that validate vendor claims in your specific environment. Both ARCON and Fortra offer evaluation programs that enable hands-on assessment before significant investment.

As noted by a CISO who recently completed this evaluation process: “The theoretical comparison was helpful, but actually implementing both solutions in our environment revealed significant differences in how they handled our unique access requirements. The proof-of-concept was essential to our final decision.”

Conclusion: Specialized Excellence vs. Integrated Security

The comparison between ARCON and Fortra ultimately highlights two valid but distinct approaches to security technology implementation: specialized excellence versus integrated security functionality.

ARCON exemplifies the specialized approach, delivering comprehensive privileged access management with depth of functionality that addresses advanced use cases and complex environments. Organizations prioritizing sophisticated PAM capabilities will find ARCON’s focused expertise valuable, particularly in highly regulated industries with strict privileged access requirements.

Fortra represents the integrated security model, offering a broad portfolio that addresses multiple security domains with consistent management and cross-product workflows. Organizations seeking to reduce security vendor proliferation or implement comprehensive security programs across multiple domains may benefit from Fortra’s approach, despite potential trade-offs in specialized functionality.

Both vendors maintain strong customer satisfaction and continue to invest in product development aligned with their strategic positioning. The optimal choice depends not on absolute superiority but on alignment with your organization’s specific security objectives, operational environment, and strategic direction.

As cybersecurity threats continue to evolve and regulatory requirements become more stringent, both specialized excellence and integrated security approaches will remain valid strategies for addressing organizational security challenges. The key to success lies in clearly understanding your specific requirements and selecting the vendor whose approach best addresses your unique security landscape.

Frequently Asked Questions: ARCON vs Fortra

Compare ARCON and Fortra on Gartner Peer Reviews

Compare ARCON and Fortra VM on G2