AT&T vs Zscaler: A Comprehensive Comparison of Enterprise Security Solutions

In today’s rapidly evolving cybersecurity landscape, businesses face unprecedented challenges in protecting their digital infrastructure. The shift to remote work, cloud-based applications, and the increasing sophistication of cyber threats have made traditional security approaches obsolete. Two leading providers offering solutions to these challenges are AT&T and Zscaler. This comprehensive analysis examines how these enterprise security powerhouses approach zero trust architecture, cloud security, and network protection in fundamentally different ways, while sometimes operating as partners in the security ecosystem.

Understanding the Market Positioning: AT&T vs Zscaler

Before diving into technical specifics, it’s crucial to understand that AT&T and Zscaler approach network security from different angles. AT&T, a telecommunications giant with a vast networking heritage, ranks #37 in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (EIV) solutions with a 0.2% market mindshare. In contrast, Zscaler ranks #1 in Zero Trust as a Service (ZaaS) with an impressive 17.5% mindshare and an average user rating of 8.4/10. While AT&T boasts a 100% recommendation rate from its users, Zscaler follows closely with 98% of its users willing to recommend their solution. This disparity highlights a fundamental difference: AT&T leverages its telecommunications infrastructure to deliver security solutions, while Zscaler was purpose-built as a cloud security platform from the ground up.

Despite these differences, the two companies have formed strategic partnerships in certain areas, combining AT&T’s vast network reach with Zscaler’s cloud security expertise. This relationship illustrates the complex, sometimes collaborative nature of the modern cybersecurity market, where competitors in one space may be partners in another.

Core Technology Architectures: Network-Centric vs Cloud-Native Approaches

The fundamental technological approaches of AT&T and Zscaler reflect their different origins and philosophies toward securing enterprise environments.

AT&T’s Network-First Security Approach

AT&T’s security solutions are built upon decades of telecommunications infrastructure experience. Their approach traditionally centers on network-based protection that secures the connections between users and resources. Key components include:

• Network-Based VPN Solutions: AT&T’s traditional strength lies in providing secure, encrypted tunnels through their vast global network infrastructure.
• MPLS Integration: AT&T leverages Multiprotocol Label Switching to provide quality of service guarantees for enterprise traffic while maintaining security.
• Software-Defined Networking (SDN): AT&T has increasingly incorporated SDN capabilities to provide more flexible and programmable network security.
• Integration with Physical Infrastructure: As a telecommunications provider, AT&T’s security offerings often integrate with physical network equipment, routers, and switches that they can manage as part of a comprehensive service.

This network-centric approach reflects AT&T’s historical strength in managing connections but has required evolution as enterprises increasingly move workloads to the cloud and adopt zero trust architectures.

Zscaler’s Cloud-Native Security Architecture

In contrast to AT&T’s network-centric approach, Zscaler was built from the ground up as a cloud service. Their architecture is fundamentally different:

• Security Service Edge (SSE) Platform: Zscaler’s architecture creates a cloud-based security perimeter that replaces traditional network security appliances.
• Direct-to-Cloud Connections: Rather than routing traffic through a corporate network, Zscaler connects users directly to applications, inspecting all traffic through their cloud security platform.
• Global Points of Presence: Zscaler operates over 150 data centers worldwide to ensure low-latency security inspection regardless of user location.
• Proxy-Based Inspection: Unlike traditional security models that focus on perimeter defense, Zscaler inspects all traffic bidirectionally, including encrypted traffic (SSL/TLS).

This cloud-native approach enables Zscaler to deliver security as a true cloud service, eliminating the need for traditional security appliances and reducing network complexity. The architecture is particularly well-suited to securing remote workers and cloud application access.

The technical implementation of Zscaler’s architecture becomes clear in how it processes traffic. When a user attempts to access a web application, instead of that traffic flowing through traditional network security devices, it’s routed to the nearest Zscaler data center, where multiple security services inspect it simultaneously:

User Request -> Zscaler Cloud -> [
    Advanced Threat Protection
    Data Loss Prevention
    SSL Inspection
    Cloud Access Security Broker
    Browser Isolation
] -> Destination Application

This cloud-based processing allows for comprehensive security without the latency that would come from passing traffic through multiple on-premises security appliances in sequence.

Zero Trust Implementation: Partnership vs Native Capabilities

Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) has become a cornerstone of modern enterprise security. Both AT&T and Zscaler offer zero trust solutions, but their implementations and approaches differ significantly.

AT&T’s Zero Trust Implementation

AT&T’s approach to zero trust leverages partnerships and integration with its existing network infrastructure. Notably, AT&T has partnered with Zscaler to deliver some of its zero trust capabilities, illustrating the complex relationship between the two companies.

AT&T’s zero trust solutions are built upon three core principles:

1. Connect users to applications, not networks: AT&T’s zero trust solutions aim to provide direct connections between users and the applications they need, reducing the attack surface by limiting broader network access.
2. Application invisibility from the internet: By making applications invisible to internet scanning, AT&T’s approach reduces the risk of targeted attacks.
3. Continuous verification: Implementing continuous verification of user identity and device posture ensures that access is only granted to verified entities.

While AT&T has developed these capabilities, it’s worth noting that their partnership with Zscaler indicates that AT&T recognizes the strength of Zscaler’s native cloud security platform for delivering zero trust capabilities. The “AT&T Zero Trust Network Access powered by Zscaler” offering demonstrates this collaborative approach.

The partnership implementation typically involves AT&T’s network services combined with Zscaler’s security cloud, as illustrated in this simplified architecture:

Client Device -> AT&T Network -> Zscaler Cloud Security Platform -> Business Applications

This hybrid approach allows AT&T customers to leverage their existing AT&T network relationships while gaining the benefits of Zscaler’s cloud security expertise.

Zscaler’s Native Zero Trust Exchange

In contrast, Zscaler’s Zero Trust Exchange represents a native, fully-integrated approach to zero trust security. As the top-ranked solution in the ZaaS category, Zscaler’s implementation is characterized by:

• Platform-Based Approach: Rather than adding zero trust capabilities to existing infrastructure, Zscaler’s platform was designed from the ground up for zero trust principles.
• Direct User-to-Application Connections: Zscaler eliminates network connections entirely, connecting users directly to applications through its security cloud.
• Four-Step Risk Management Process: Zscaler implements a comprehensive approach to managing security risk:
  1. Prevent compromise through multiple layers of prevention technologies
  2. Prevent lateral movement by eliminating network access
  3. Prevent data loss through inline content inspection
  4. Utilize user behavior analytics to identify anomalous activity
• Integrated Service Modules: Zscaler’s platform includes integrated secure web gateway, cloud firewall, CASB, browser isolation, and data loss prevention capabilities within a single cloud service.

The technical implementation of Zscaler’s Zero Trust Exchange can be represented in the following code-like structure:

// Simplified representation of Zscaler's Zero Trust decision flow
function processAccessRequest(user, device, application, content) {
    // Step 1: Verify identity and context
    const userContext = authenticateUser(user);
    const deviceContext = verifyDeviceHealth(device);
    
    // Step 2: Apply policy based on context
    const policy = getPolicyForUser(userContext);
    
    // Step 3: Determine if access should be granted
    if (userContext.authenticated && 
        deviceContext.healthy && 
        policy.allowsAccess(application)) {
        
        // Step 4: Apply security controls to content
        const securedContent = inspectAndSecureContent(content, policy);
        
        // Step 5: Allow connection to application
        return connectToApplication(application, securedContent);
    } else {
        // Deny access
        return denyAccess(user, application);
    }
}

This native approach gives Zscaler distinct advantages in delivering consistent security policies across all users, locations, and applications without the complexity of integrating disparate security products.

Technical Capabilities Comparison: Deep Dive

Let’s examine the specific technical capabilities of both solutions across key security dimensions.

Threat Protection Capabilities

Capability	AT&T	Zscaler
Advanced Threat Protection	Offers through partnership integrations, including with Zscaler	Native cloud-based advanced threat protection with AI-powered analysis
SSL/TLS Inspection	Available through network appliances and cloud services	Full inline SSL inspection at cloud scale without performance degradation
Browser Isolation	Limited native capabilities	Cloud browser isolation that renders risky web content in the cloud
Sandboxing	Available through partnerships	Cloud-based sandboxing with real-time analysis of unknown files

Zscaler’s cloud-native architecture provides advantages in processing intensive security functions like SSL inspection and sandboxing at scale. Their approach removes the performance bottlenecks that traditional hardware-based security appliances encounter when performing deep packet inspection of encrypted traffic. For enterprises with high volumes of encrypted traffic (now representing over 95% of web traffic), this architectural difference is significant.

AT&T’s approach typically relies on a combination of on-premises appliances and cloud services, which can create challenges in capacity planning and scaling. However, AT&T’s integration with telecommunications infrastructure can provide advantages for organizations with significant investments in MPLS and private network infrastructure.

Data Protection Implementation

Data protection represents a critical aspect of enterprise security, particularly as data privacy regulations like GDPR and CCPA impose strict requirements on organizations.

Capability	AT&T	Zscaler
Data Loss Prevention (DLP)	Available through integration with third-party DLP solutions	Native inline DLP with 3,000+ data identifiers and exact data match capabilities
CASB Functionality	Limited native capabilities, often through partnerships	Integrated CASB for both API and inline protection of cloud applications
SaaS Security Posture Management	Limited capabilities	Native SSPM capabilities to identify and remediate SaaS misconfigurations
Data Security Posture Management	Limited capabilities	DSPM capabilities to discover, classify, and protect sensitive data across cloud environments

Zscaler’s approach to data protection is characterized by deep integration across multiple channels – web, cloud applications, endpoints, and email. Their inline architecture allows them to inspect content in real-time as it moves between users and applications, rather than retroactively analyzing logs or snapshots.

A technical example of how Zscaler’s inline DLP functions can be conceptualized as:

// Pseudocode representing Zscaler's inline DLP processing
function processOutboundData(userData, destination) {
    // Step 1: Identify the data being transferred
    const dataClassification = classifyData(userData);
    
    // Step 2: Check against policies
    const policy = getPolicyForDestination(destination);
    
    // Step 3: Determine if transfer violates policy
    if (dataClassification.sensitivity === 'PII' && 
        policy.prohibitsPII) {
        
        // Step 4: Apply remediation action
        return policy.remediationAction({
            options: [
                'Block',
                'Encrypt',
                'Redact',
                'Notify',
                'LogIncident'
            ]
        });
    } else {
        // Allow the transfer
        return allowTransfer(userData, destination);
    }
}

AT&T’s data protection capabilities are typically delivered through integration with specialized third-party solutions rather than as native platform capabilities. While this can provide flexibility in selecting best-of-breed solutions, it also introduces complexity in deployment, management, and policy consistency.

Performance and Scalability Considerations

Enterprise security solutions must balance protection with performance to avoid becoming bottlenecks that impede business operations.

Consideration	AT&T	Zscaler
Architecture Impact	Network-centric approach can create hairpinning of traffic through central security checkpoints	Distributed cloud architecture with 150+ data centers minimizes latency
Scale Model	Typically requires capacity planning and hardware sizing	Elastic cloud scaling without hardware limitations
Global Coverage	Strong in regions with AT&T network presence	Consistent global coverage through cloud data centers
Remote Work Optimization	Traditional VPN approaches can create performance bottlenecks for remote users	Optimized for direct-to-cloud access from any location

Zscaler’s cloud-native architecture provides significant advantages for organizations with globally distributed workforces and cloud applications. By processing security in cloud data centers located near both users and applications, Zscaler minimizes the latency impact of security processing.

A typical traffic flow in Zscaler’s architecture might look like:

Remote User (San Francisco) -> Zscaler Cloud Node (San Francisco) -> [Security Processing] -> Cloud Application (AWS US-West)

In contrast, a traditional network security architecture might require:

Remote User (San Francisco) -> VPN Gateway -> Corporate Network -> Security Stack -> Internet Gateway -> Cloud Application (AWS US-West)

This difference in traffic flow explains why Zscaler’s approach often delivers superior performance for remote users accessing cloud applications. However, AT&T’s approach may offer advantages for organizations with significant on-premises applications that are already optimized for their network infrastructure.

Implementation and Deployment Models

Beyond technical capabilities, successful security deployments depend heavily on implementation and operational models that align with an organization’s resources and expertise.

AT&T’s Service-Led Deployment Model

AT&T approaches security deployment with a service-led model that leverages their telecommunications heritage:

• Managed Service Options: AT&T offers fully managed security services where their teams handle implementation, monitoring, and management.
• Co-managed Services: Organizations can select which components AT&T manages versus what in-house teams control.
• Professional Services: AT&T provides consulting and implementation services to design and deploy security solutions.
• Network Integration: AT&T’s security solutions are often integrated with their broader networking offerings, providing single-vendor simplicity for organizations already using AT&T networks.

This service-led approach can be advantageous for organizations with limited security expertise or those seeking to outsource security operations. AT&T’s ability to combine security with network services allows for integrated solutions where network and security policies can be aligned.

Zscaler’s Cloud Platform Deployment

Zscaler’s deployment model reflects their cloud-native architecture:

• SaaS Platform: Zscaler is delivered as a true SaaS platform without hardware or software to deploy and manage.
• Lightweight Connectors: Implementation typically involves deploying lightweight connectors or forwarding agents rather than complex appliances.
• Rapid Deployment: Cloud-based deployment allows for rapid implementation and scaling without traditional procurement cycles.
• Identity Provider Integration: Zscaler integrates with existing identity providers (Azure AD, Okta, etc.) to align access policies with identity management.

A typical Zscaler deployment process includes:

1. Configure Identity Provider Integration
2. Deploy Zscaler Client Connector to endpoints or configure forwarding from network devices
3. Define security policies in Zscaler Admin Console
4. Test initial user access
5. Gradually migrate user traffic from existing security controls to Zscaler

This cloud-first approach enables rapid deployment but requires organizations to adapt to a cloud service model rather than traditional network security management. For organizations with significant investments in security operations centers and security engineering talent, this shift can require operational adjustments.

Hybrid and Multi-Cloud Support

Modern enterprises typically operate in hybrid and multi-cloud environments, requiring security solutions that can protect workloads across diverse environments.

Environment	AT&T	Zscaler
On-Premises Data Centers	Strong integration with traditional data center security	Supported through cloud connectors and direct integrations
Public Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP)	Supported through partner integrations and virtual appliances	Native support with cloud-to-cloud inspection and workload protection
SaaS Applications	Limited native CASB capabilities	Strong CASB and SaaS security through inline and API-based controls
Multi-Cloud Consistency	Can vary based on implementations in different environments	Consistent security model across all environments through cloud platform

Zscaler’s architecture provides advantages in delivering consistent security across diverse environments because the security processing happens in their cloud rather than requiring environment-specific implementations. This approach supports the concept of “identical security everywhere” regardless of where users or applications are located.

AT&T’s approach may involve different technical implementations across environments but can provide strong integration with each environment’s native capabilities. This can be advantageous for organizations with environment-specific security requirements or regulatory constraints.

Use Case Analysis: Where Each Solution Excels

Different organizational contexts and requirements may favor either AT&T or Zscaler. Let’s examine specific use cases where each solution demonstrates particular strengths.

Optimal Use Cases for AT&T Security Solutions

AT&T’s security offerings are particularly well-suited to the following scenarios:

• Organizations with significant AT&T network investments: Companies with existing AT&T network services can benefit from integrated security that leverages their existing infrastructure.
• Regulated industries requiring managed services: Organizations in heavily regulated industries often benefit from AT&T’s ability to provide compliance-focused managed security services.
• Hybrid deployments with significant on-premises components: AT&T’s traditional strength in securing network infrastructure makes them suitable for organizations maintaining substantial on-premises deployments.
• Organizations seeking consolidation of networking and security vendors: AT&T’s broad portfolio allows organizations to reduce vendor complexity by sourcing multiple services from a single provider.

A typical AT&T deployment scenario might involve:

Corporate Locations: MPLS + AT&T Managed Security Services
Remote Workers: AT&T Global Network Client + Security
Cloud Resources: Virtual security gateways + cloud integrations

This approach provides consistent management through AT&T’s portals and services while leveraging their telecommunications infrastructure for secure connectivity.

Optimal Use Cases for Zscaler Solutions

Zscaler’s cloud-native architecture excels in these scenarios:

• Organizations embracing zero trust architecture: Zscaler’s platform was built from the ground up for zero trust principles, making it ideal for organizations fully committed to this security model.
• Cloud-first enterprises: Organizations that have embraced cloud applications and infrastructure benefit from Zscaler’s cloud-native approach.
• Highly distributed workforces: Zscaler’s global cloud architecture provides consistent performance for users regardless of location, making it ideal for organizations with remote and international employees.
• Organizations seeking to eliminate network security appliances: Zscaler enables the complete elimination of traditional security appliances like secure web gateways, VPN concentrators, and branch firewalls.
• Security transformation initiatives: Organizations undergoing digital transformation that includes modernizing security architecture often find Zscaler’s approach aligns with broader transformation goals.

A typical Zscaler deployment pattern involves:

Users -> Zscaler Client Connector -> Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange -> [
    SaaS Applications
    Public Cloud Resources
    Private Applications
]

This model eliminates the need for traffic to flow through corporate networks for security processing, reducing complexity and improving performance.

Partnership Use Cases: When Both Solutions Work Together

As mentioned earlier, AT&T and Zscaler have established partnerships in certain areas. These partnership scenarios represent use cases where the combined strengths of both companies provide optimal solutions:

• AT&T network customers seeking cloud-native security: Organizations with existing AT&T network services can leverage “AT&T ZTNA powered by Zscaler” to add cloud security without changing network providers.
• Complex hybrid environments: Some organizations benefit from AT&T’s network expertise combined with Zscaler’s cloud security capabilities to secure diverse environments.
• Phased transformation: Organizations can use the partnership to gradually transition from traditional network security to zero trust models while maintaining existing relationships.

This partnership highlights that in many cases, the choice isn’t strictly binary. Organizations can leverage aspects of both vendors’ solutions through partnership offerings.

Cost Structure and ROI Considerations

Beyond technical capabilities, cost structures and return on investment play crucial roles in security solution selection.

AT&T’s Cost Model

AT&T’s pricing model typically follows traditional enterprise IT service patterns:

• Service-based pricing: Costs often structured around service levels and management options.
• Network + Security bundling: Organizations may achieve cost savings by bundling security with network services.
• Capital + Operational expenses: Depending on the implementation, may involve both capital expenses for equipment and operational expenses for services.
• Custom enterprise agreements: Large organizations typically negotiate custom enterprise agreements rather than standard pricing.

ROI from AT&T solutions often comes from:

• Reduced complexity through vendor consolidation
• Integrated network and security management
• Leveraging existing AT&T relationships and infrastructure

Zscaler’s Cost Model

Zscaler follows a cloud subscription model:

• User-based subscription: Pricing typically based on per-user subscriptions rather than bandwidth or traffic volume.
• Tiered services: Different subscription levels provide access to different platform capabilities.
• Pure operational expense: As a cloud service, Zscaler represents an operational expense without capital investments in hardware.
• Bundles vs. individual services: Organizations can license the full Zero Trust Exchange or individual services like ZIA (Internet Access) or ZPA (Private Access).

ROI from Zscaler typically comes from:

• Elimination of security appliances and associated maintenance
• Reduced network complexity by eliminating security-driven traffic routing
• Operational efficiency through cloud management
• Improved user experience leading to productivity gains

A typical TCO comparison might consider the following elements:

Cost Component	Traditional Security Approach	Zscaler Cloud Approach
Hardware	Significant capital expense for appliances	Eliminated
Software Licenses	Perpetual licenses + maintenance	Subscription-based
Implementation	Complex deployment across locations	Simplified cloud configuration
Operational Management	Significant staff time for updates, maintenance	Reduced operational overhead
Scaling Costs	Step functions as capacity is reached	Linear with user growth

Organizations evaluating these solutions should conduct comprehensive TCO analyses that consider their specific environments, existing investments, and operational models.

Future Direction: Vendor Roadmaps and Industry Trends

Understanding the strategic direction of security vendors helps organizations make forward-looking decisions that align with long-term security needs.

AT&T’s Strategic Direction

AT&T’s security strategy appears to be evolving in several key directions:

• Integration of 5G and security: Leveraging 5G networks to deliver enhanced security capabilities with improved performance.
• Strategic partnerships: Continuing to develop partnerships with specialized security vendors (including Zscaler) to augment their portfolio.
• Managed security services growth: Expanding managed security offerings to address the cybersecurity skills gap many organizations face.
• IoT security focus: Developing specialized security for the growing Internet of Things ecosystem that will leverage 5G connectivity.

As telecommunications and security continue to converge, AT&T’s position at this intersection provides unique opportunities to deliver integrated solutions that smaller security-specific vendors cannot match.

Zscaler’s Strategic Direction

Zscaler’s roadmap focuses on extending their cloud-native security platform:

• Expanding zero trust beyond users: Extending zero trust principles to workload-to-workload communications and IoT.
• Enhanced AI/ML capabilities: Increasing the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning for threat detection and policy automation.
• Deeper application protection: Moving beyond access control to provide enhanced in-app security capabilities.
• Digital experience monitoring: Integrating security with user experience monitoring to ensure security doesn’t impede productivity.

Zscaler’s continued focus on cloud-native security positions them well as organizations increasingly embrace cloud and SaaS applications, though they may face challenges in environments with significant legacy infrastructure requirements.

Industry Convergence and What It Means for Customers

The security industry is experiencing significant convergence across previously distinct categories:

• Networking and security convergence: The rise of Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) combines networking and security functions.
• Identity-centered security: Identity is increasingly becoming the control point for security rather than network location.
• Platform consolidation: Organizations are seeking to reduce security vendor sprawl through platform approaches.
• AI-driven automation: Machine learning is becoming essential for processing vast security data volumes.

These trends suggest that organizations should evaluate security solutions not just on current capabilities but on their ability to adapt to this converging landscape. Both AT&T and Zscaler are positioning themselves for this convergence, though with different approaches reflecting their heritage and core strengths.

The partnership between AT&T and Zscaler itself reflects this convergence, as networking providers and cloud security providers find complementary strengths that benefit customers navigating this complex landscape.

Conclusion: Making the Right Choice for Your Enterprise

Selecting between AT&T and Zscaler—or determining how to leverage both through partnership offerings—requires careful analysis of your organization’s specific context and requirements.

Organizations should consider:

• Security transformation goals: Are you seeking to maintain and enhance existing security models, or fundamentally transform to zero trust architecture?
• Existing investments: Do you have significant investments in AT&T network services that could be leveraged?
• Cloud adoption maturity: Organizations further along in cloud adoption may find Zscaler’s approach more naturally aligned with their infrastructure.
• Operational model: Do you prefer managed services or operating security platforms with in-house teams?
• User distribution: Organizations with highly distributed workforces may benefit more from Zscaler’s global cloud architecture.

For many enterprises, the optimal approach may involve elements of both solutions—leveraging AT&T’s network expertise and managed services while adopting Zscaler’s cloud security capabilities through either direct engagement or through AT&T’s partnership offerings.

The security landscape continues to evolve rapidly, with both vendors adapting their offerings to address emerging threats and changing business needs. Organizations should establish regular reviews of their security architecture to ensure alignment with both their business requirements and the evolving capabilities of their security providers.

Ultimately, the choice between AT&T and Zscaler is less about which vendor is objectively superior and more about which approach—or combination of approaches—best aligns with your organization’s specific security requirements, operational model, and digital transformation journey.

Frequently Asked Questions about AT&T vs Zscaler

Learn more about Zscaler’s platform | Explore AT&T’s zero trust solutions